In a recent announcement that sent ripples through the boxing community, Turki Alalshikh revealed his plans to stage a high-stakes undercard featuring a bout between Jared Anderson and Jarrell ‘Big Baby’ Miller, set to precede the much-anticipated Canelo Alvarez vs. Terence Crawford main event on September 13th. As Alalshikh strategizes to capture the attention of boxing fans, the choice of Miller for such a crucial card raises eyebrows. Are we witnessing a progressive evolution in the sport, or is this an ill-conceived pairing meant to squeeze profits at the expense of fan interest?
The Thrill of Anticipation or Disappointment?
The excitement around Canelo vs. Crawford is palpable, but the undercard’s appeal is pivotal in generating overall interest. The inclusion of Anderson-Miller among the four main fights is meant to attract viewers, but one can’t help but question the viability of this match-up. Anderson, a rising star in the heavyweight division, is set to face a fighter who has been marred by controversy and unsteady performances. Miller’s last victories date back to a time when he was regarded as a formidable opponent; however, since then, his career has been blemished by issues ranging from performance-enhancing drug violations to lackluster bouts.
What makes Miller’s involvement all the more questionable is the growing sentiment among fans who demand integrity and skill in the ring. With his last notable victory against a recognizable opponent occurring two years ago against Anthony Joshua, his recent appearances have left much to be desired. This reality may lure fans in with curiosity but could quickly turn to apathy once the bell rings.
The Better Alternatives
Instead of showcasing a bout that many perceive as a desperate attempt to revive Miller’s career, Alalshikh and his team could consider more compelling match-ups for Anderson. Potential candidates like Agit Kabayel, Richard Torrez Jr., or Bakhodir Jalalov could bring a fresh perspective to the undercard. These fighters not only have compelling records, but they also bring a sense of legitimacy that would serve to elevate the overall card.
It’s essential to recognize that boxing thrives on talent and narratives that engage fans on multiple levels. In proposing such ambitious plans, Alalshikh risks alienating a segment of his audience that craves a higher caliber of competition, particularly in a space that is increasingly scrutinized for its lack of transparency and authenticity.
The Role of Streaming Platforms
Interestingly, Alalshikh made mention of Netflix’s involvement in broadcasting the event, adding a layer of allure that could draw in not just boxing aficionados, but casual viewers as well. With streaming platforms revolutionizing how sporting events are consumed, the potential for the card to achieve wide-viewer reach is significant. However, this relies heavily on the quality of fights presented. If the undercard fails to deliver, it could inadvertently tarnish the reputation of boxing as a whole.
While the prospect of free preliminary bouts that promise “six to ten” fights could entice viewers, one must ask: will the slight shift to accessible programming make up for the substantial risk of featuring fighters like Miller who fail to inspire confidence or excitement?
Fan Collaboration in Boxing
Turki’s own words shine a light on the need for fan-centric programming: “I work from the side of fans. I care about what fans want to watch.” This sentiment is commendable, yet it also underscores the disconnect that can exist between management and the boxing community. The boxing landscape is changing, with fans becoming more vocal about their preferences. This shift points not only to a desire for high-quality matchups but also an unwillingness to support fighters who have previously undermined the sport through unethical practices.
Promoters must navigate carefully through this new territory, ensuring that they take fan feedback into account while keeping the integrity of boxing intact. The Canelo-Crawford matchup may promise excitement, but it is only as good as the undercard that supports it.
The weight of contemporary boxing hangs not just on star power but on the commitment to quality—an aspect that seems to be just as critical as the names on the marquee. It remains to be seen how this will play out in the ring come September.